International Business Essay Questions - 6472 Words

International Business – Essay Questions 1. Gini Coefficient: The gini index is a measure of statistical dispersion, a measure of the inequality of a distribution, 0 being total equality and a value of 1 maximal inequality. It is most commonly used in economics to assess the inequality of wealth or income, but is also used in other fields such as health, science, ecology, chemistry and engineering. Gini coefficients range from 0.23 (Sweden) to 0.70 (Namibia), but not every country has been assessed. The index is defined through the Lorenz curve, by plotting the proportion of the total income of the population (y-axis) by the bottom x% of the population): The 45 degree line represents the total inequality line. The Gini coefficient is†¦show more content†¦It is defined as a forum for the countries committed to democracy and the market economy, where discussions revolve around policy experiences, common problems, identifying good practices and coordinating domestic and international policies of its members. Initially, the organization began in Europe in 1948 (OEEC) in France to help administer the Marshal Plan for reconstructing Europe after WWII. Its membership was extended to non-European states in 1961, when it was renamed the OECD. Most members are high-income economies with a high HDI index, and are regarded as developed nations (Chile being the exception). Headquarters are in Paris. In the 1950’s, the OEEC provided the framework for negotiations to created a European free trade area to bring members together on a multilateral basis. The OECD was founded consisting of all European memberships as well as the USA and Canada, Japan joining three years later. In the next 12 years, Finland, Australia and New Zealand would join the organization. Following the fall of communism throughout Eastern Europe in 1989, the organization helped countries in preparing the market economy reforms. Programs such as â€Å"Partners in Transitions† were created with the cooperation of Czechoslovakia, Hungary and Poland. In 2003, the OECD established a working group headed by Japan’s Ambassador to the OECD to work out a strategy for the enlargement of cooperation with non-members. Objectives and Activities: Mandate ofShow MoreRelatedInternational Business Essay Questions1592 Words   |  7 PagesSection One: Questions # 2 and #3 Question #2 a. Define and explain the term Culture Ans.: Culture is a set of shared values, understandings, assumptions, and goals that are learned from earlier generations, imposed by present members of a society, and passed on to succeeding generations. Culture is basically the way of life of a people: what they eat, the music they listen, how they dress, their meal times, their language and art form, and so on. b. Give examples if operational conflicts thatRead MoreInternational Business Essay Questions4285 Words   |  18 Pages1.. Identify the five cultural dimensions identified by Geert Hofstede and describe them indicating their importance in international business. 2.. Compare the advantages and disadvantages of various modes of entering foreign markets. 3.. Why do we have international strategic alliances? What are the forms and their respective advantages and disadvantages? ---------------- 4.. Consider a firm facing a make-or-buy decision, Provide 2 potential benefits and 2 risks  that the firm may face from outsourcingRead MoreIbe International Business Questions Essay example9943 Words   |  40 PagesTopic 1: International Business 1. Why companies engage in international business? There are three major operating objectives that underline the reasons for companies to engage in international business: -expanding sales: pursuing international sales usually increases the potential market and potential profits -acquiring resources: foreign sources may give companies lower costs, new or better products, additional operating knowledge -minimizing risk: international operations may reduceRead MoreBusiness 115 Final Exam Study Guide Essay1334 Words   |  6 Pagespoints that you may enter only once. You have 3.5 hours to complete the exam. It consists of 30 multiple choice questions worth 5 points each. There are 5 essay questions worth 20 points each. Be sure to save and save often while you are working on the exam, and submit the exam when you are finished. To earn full credit your response to each essay question should answer the question completely and average 2 – 3 paragraphs in length. The exam reflects the following course objectives and possibleRead MoreThe Cross Boarder Movements Of Good, Services And Resources1480 Words   |  6 Pages Question 1. In a short essay discuss why government have been liberalizing cross-boarder movements of good, services and resources. As we learned in the course international business is growing more and more for every year. Today 25% of all business is international business. This has almost forced countries and their governments to change the laws and regulations around cross boarder movement of goods, services and resources. As access is easier now for everyday costumers to international goodRead MoreMilton Friedman1624 Words   |  7 PagesIn this essay I evaluate Milton Friedman’s essay: â€Å"The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits† in 1970, on the Social Responsibility of a business and his theory, which is called the â€Å"Efficiency Perspective†. In every article and book that I have read about social responsibility, Friedman’s â€Å"Efficiency Perspective is placed centrally. During my research I found that Friedman is often criticized for being too classical. Friedman believes that manager’s foremost objective or evenRead MoreBook Review1213 Words   |  5 PagesThe format, in which each chapter poses a question, then includes one or more essays responding â€Å"NO† and one or more responding â€Å"YES†, forces the reader to challenge his/her assumptions and consider alternative perspectives. I appreciated this approach very much. Just when you think you agree with something, the next essay challenges the basis for that agreement. That kind of questioning always gets one to a better conclusion, and it forced me to question a good number of assumptions I had aboutRead MoreBUSN115 Final Exam Study Guide1656 Words   |  7 Pagesyou may enter only once. You have 3.5 hours to complete the exam. It consists of 25 multiple choice questions worth 6 points each. There are 7 essay questions, 6 worth 15 points and 1 worth 10 points. Be sure to save and save often while you are working on the exam, and submit the exam when you are finished. To earn full credit your response to each essay question should answer the question completely and average 2 – 3 paragraphs in length. The exam reflects the following course objectives andRead MoreHow to Write Accounting Essay1074 Words   |  5 PagesHow to write an accounting essay... The basis of most academic work is the ability to construct a good essay. Although this sounds obvious, it is a skill which most students need to develop as none of us is born with the natural ability to write an essay, never mind one which will both address a given topic effectively and adequately support an argument with evidence. The most important aspect of writing an accounting essay or report is that the content must be informative and factually accurate;Read MoreEssay on Mgt 520 Final Exam Study1408 Words   |  6 Pagesfinal exam environment, the Windows clipboard is disabled, and so you will not be able to copy exam questions or answers to or from other applications. There are three pages to your final, and each page begins with a story. The stories are quite interesting and will make the questions flow easily. The questions that follow are then taken from each story. There is a little overlap. Remember questions are scrambled, so while they vary, all TCO’s will be tested. 2. You should click the Save Answers

Types of Sampling Designs Used in Sociology

Since its rarely possible to study an entire population of focus, researchers use samples when they seek to collect data and answer research questions. A sample is simply a subset of the population being studied; it represents the larger population and is used to draw inferences about that population. Sociologists typically use two sampling techniques: those based on probability and those that are not. They can generate different kinds of samples using both techniques. Non-Probability Sampling Techniques The non-probability model is a technique in which samples are gathered in a way that does not give all individuals in a population equal chances of being selected. While choosing a non-probability method could result in biased data or a limited ability to make general inferences based on the findings, there are also many situations in which choosing this kind of sampling technique is the best choice for the particular research question or the stage of research. Four kinds of samples may be created with the non-probability model. Reliance on Available Subjects Relying on available subjects is a risky model that requires a great deal of caution on the part of the researcher. Since it entails sampling passersby or individuals with whom researchers randomly come into contact, it is sometimes referred to as a convenience sample because it does not allow the researcher to have any control over the representativeness of the sample. While this sampling method has drawbacks, it is useful if the researcher wants to study the characteristics of people passing by on a street corner at a certain point in time, especially if conducting such research would not be possible otherwise. For this reason, convenience samples are commonly used in the early or pilot stages of research, before a larger research project is launched. Though this method can be useful, the researcher will not be able to use the results from a convenience sample to generalize about a wider population. Purposive or Judgmental Sample A purposive or judgmental sample is one that is selected based on the knowledge of a population and the purpose of the study. For example, when sociologists at the University of San Francisco wanted to study the long-term emotional and psychological effects of choosing to terminate a pregnancy, they created a sample that exclusively included women whod gotten abortions. In this case, the researchers used a purposive sample because those being interviewed fit a specific purpose or description that was necessary to conduct the research. Snowball Sample A snowball sample is appropriate to use in research when the members of a population are difficult to locate, such as homeless individuals, migrant workers, or undocumented immigrants. A snowball sample is one in which the researcher collects data on the few members of the target population he or she can locate and then asks those individuals to provide the information needed to locate other members of that population. For example, if a researcher wanted to interview undocumented immigrants from Mexico, she might interview a few undocumented individuals that she knows or can locate. Afterward, she would rely on those subjects to help locate more undocumented individuals. This process continues until the researcher has all the interviews she needs, or until all contacts have been exhausted. This technique is useful when studying a sensitive topic that people might not openly talk about, or if talking about the issues under investigation could jeopardize their safety. A recommendation from a friend or acquaintance that the researcher can be trusted works to grow the sample size.   Quota Sample A quota sample is one in which units are selected into a sample on the basis of pre-specified characteristics so that the total sample has the same distribution of characteristics assumed to exist in the population being studied. For example, researchers conducting a national quota sample might need to know which proportion of the population is male and which proportion is female. They might also need to know the percentage of men and women who fall under different age, race, or class brackets, among others. The researcher would then collect a sample that reflected those proportions. Probability Sampling Techniques The probability model is a technique wherein samples are gathered in a way that gives all the individuals in the population an equal chance of being selected. Many consider this to be the more methodologically rigorous approach to sampling because it eliminates social biases that could shape the research sample. Ultimately, though, the sampling technique you choose should be the one that best allows you to respond to your particular research question. There are four kinds of probability sampling techniques. Simple Random Sample The simple random sample is the basic sampling method assumed in statistical methods and computations. To collect a simple random sample, each unit of the target population is assigned a number. A set of random numbers  is then generated and the units of those numbers are included in the sample. A researcher studying a population of 1,000 might wish to choose a random sample of 50 people. First, each person is numbered 1 through 1,000. Then, you generate a list of 50 random numbers, typically with a computer program, and the individuals assigned those numbers are the ones included in the sample. When studying people, this technique is best used with a homogenous population, or one that does not differ much by age, race, education level, or class. This is because when dealing with a more heterogeneous population, a researcher runs the risk of creating a biased sample if demographic differences are not taken into account. Systematic Sample In a systematic sample, the elements of the population are put into a list and then every nth element in the list is chosen systematically for inclusion in the sample. For example, if the population of study contained 2,000 students at a high school and the researcher wanted a sample of 100 students, the students would be put into list form and then every 20th student would be selected for inclusion in the sample. To ensure against any possible human bias in this method, the researcher should select the first individual at random. This is technically called a systematic sample with a random start. Stratified Sample A stratified sample is a sampling technique in which the researcher divides the entire target population into different subgroups  or strata, and then randomly selects the final subjects proportionally from the different strata. This type of sampling is used when the researcher wants to highlight specific subgroups within the population. For example, to obtain a stratified sample of university students, the researcher would first organize the population by college class and then select appropriate numbers of freshmen, sophomores, juniors, and seniors. This would ensure that the researcher has adequate amounts of subjects from each class in the final sample. Cluster Sample Cluster sampling may be used when it is either impossible or impractical to compile an exhaustive list of the elements that make up the target population. Usually, however, the population elements are already grouped into subpopulations and lists of those subpopulations already exist or can be created. Perhaps a studys target population is church members in the United States. There is no list of all church members in the country. The researcher could, however, create a list of churches in the United States, choose a sample of churches, and then obtain lists of members from those churches. Updated  by Nicki Lisa Cole, Ph.D.

Breast Cancer Speech Free Essays

Breast Cancer The topic of cancer is a very sensitive one. Cancer is a disease of which in many cases is fatal and has affected the lives of many and sadly will continue to affect the lives of many more. I chose to explore the topic of breast cancer because it is one of personal interest to me. We will write a custom essay sample on Breast Cancer Speech or any similar topic only for you Order Now This topic interests me for various reasons but mainly because breast cancer is most prone to and extremely common in women of all ages and I myself am a young woman growing up in society. As shown in recent statistics———————–. I also wanted to make others aware of the harsh reality of breast cancer and expose them to some of the true emotions experienced by the victims and their loved ones. My I. A. is based on how a woman’s life is affected by being diagnoses with breast cancer. It explores the emotional impact on her and the way in which she handles this difficult time in her life. It also shows the support given to her by her best friend who goes through this difficult time with her. Just as in the story many women are being diagnosed with breast cancer everyday and as said before, unfortunately it is extremely prominent and common in females. Dying of Breast Cancer in the 1800s iframe class="wp-embedded-content" sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" style="position: absolute; clip: rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);" src="https://phdessay.com/dying-of-breast-cancer-in-the-1800s/embed/#?secret=DZlgKsqrgM" data-secret="DZlgKsqrgM" width="500" height="282" title="#8220;Dying of Breast Cancer in the 1800s#8221; #8212; Free Essays - PhDessay.com" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no"/iframe Cancer not only affects the lives of the patient but also their many loved ones or anyone close to them for that matter. It is a disease which can affect the emotional, social and financial well being of an individual. When an individual is diagnosed with breast cancer or any cancer at all their lives and lifestyles can change drastically over a short period of time. These changes are usually for the worst. It may take a lot of time together with love and support to restore lives back to their normal order or as close to it as possible. Some of the difficulties experienced in writing about this topic were being able to capture actual emotions of a cancer patient and the effects on their loved ones. While it was almost extremely easy to think of some of the possible emotional effects of cancer, it was a difficult task to actually transfer their emotions to paper. I was able to overcome this difficulty by reading actual articles written by real cancer victims on the internet. By reading their articles I was able to internalize and better understand some of their emotions. With this being said, the internet was my main source of information. I visited sites which contained both fictional and factual articles on cancer patients. The internet was a great source because I was able to pull both recent and dated information and even future estimated statistics. My other sources where books written about breast cancer patients. Those too were good sources because they provided great facts and true emotions. In general all sources used seemed to be extremely reliable as they provided information written by experts and they provided statistics from many researches which were all fairly dated. In conclusion, breast cancer is a topic of great interest to me because of its effects on women. Although there were some difficulties experienced in expressing the real emotion of breast cancer patients, I was able to overcome that with the use of reliable sources and information. I have personally been able to learn a great deal from the exploration of this topic. I am now aware of the reality of this disease and the tragedy it brings to a family. As a young woman growing up in society I will try my best to prevent the contraction of this disease in any way possible and I hope that readers both locally and internationally, will assist in the promotion in breast cancer awareness and education. How to cite Breast Cancer Speech, Papers

The Ideals Of Justice Essay Research Paper free essay sample

The Ideals Of Justice Essay, Research Paper The thought of justness has been really outstanding in the readings and treatments that we have had this one-fourth. The Old Testament and Plato # 8217 ; s Republic both give definitions and ideals of justness, but sometimes these thoughts are contrasting or even hypocritical in their several patterns. These books both give illustrations of justness and how people come across their single thoughts of what justness is. I will seek to research these ideas and explicate non merely what justness is, but besides how persons set up their ain readings of the word justness. Because everyone # 8217 ; s # 8217 ; thoughts are different, we must foremost set up a common thought of justness. To make this we must look no further than the Oxford American Dictionary ; which defines justness as # 8220 ; fairness. # 8221 ; Socrates would inquire, # 8220 ; what is fairness and who decides that it is just? # 8221 ; In the Old Testament, God would make up ones mind the definition of equity, becaus e what He says is right. Each of these authoritative texts gives good penetration on the topic of justness, sometimes they agree and sometimes their sentiments are conflicting. In either instance we can associate these thoughts to the modern-day American society which we live in. In the Old Testament justness is what God says it is, and gives a clear set of guidelines stating how to be a merely individual. In the Old Testament, if one does as God said, they are merely, if they do non make non obey God, so they are unfair. The most obvious of these regulations are the Ten Commandments which include: thou shall non kill, steal or disobey God. When one of these regulations is broken so the individual who broke the regulation is said to hold sinned, and by transgressing they have done an unfair act. When a individual sins they are punished by a title equal to that of which they have committed. In the book of Genesis when Cain kills his brother Abel, God punishes Cain by doing him roll the Earth for the remainder of his life. Cain responds to God by stating that work forces will certainly seek to kill him for what he has done. God answers stating, # 8220 ; if anyone kills Cain, he will endure retribution seven times over. # 8221 ; This illustration shows that in true justness harmonizing to the Old Testament, retribution is required to uphold justness. Cipher will acquire off with unfair workss, because justness is ideally served in the terminal. By # 8220 ; the terminal # 8221 ; it is implied that they will pay in this life or in heaven or snake pit. The Old Testament gives us the thought that justness comes from the word of God and that it will be dealt to the unfair individual at least every bit harshly as the act they committed to merit it. The thoughts of justness presented in Plato # 8217 ; s book The Republic are non as clear cut as those of the Old Testament. It starts off by stating that justness is # 8220 ; giving everyone his due. # 8221 ; What that individual deserves is up to the person or the province depending on the state of affairs. They decide that justness came into the universe because people were afraid of each other. They made the instance that people agreed non to harm each other and made regulations to implement this thought. Socrates said that there are three parts of the head: ground, emotion, and desire. In a merely individual, the ground portion will ever be in control of the other two parts of the head. He compared justness to the human organic structure when he said that justness in the head is like wellness in the organic structure. Socrates besides says that is impossible to be merely in an unfair society because the fortunes of the unfair impact the manque merely people and coerce them to be slightly unfair. It is concluded that a merely individual is one with cognition and an unfair individual is nescient. Both the New Testament and Plato # 8217 ; s Republic give good penetrations to the definition of justness. Each makes strong points and there are many similarities between the two. In Plato # 8217 ; s Republic Socrates states that penalty does non harm people. The lone manner that a adult male can be genuinely harmed is by being made a worse adult male. What is truly harmful is non pain but his ain unfairness. This is really close to Christian philosophies. In theory, one is non supposed to penalize person for his or her actions but instead to turn the other cheek. In pattern though this was non ever the instance. The most obvious similarity is their thoughts of justness both holding to make with retaliation. In the Old Testament there is the narrative of Noah. God was disgusted by the unfairnesss that adult male was making. He found Noah, a merely adult male, and decided to salvage merely him from the inundation that would pass over out all world. God was moving in a manner that H e thought to be merely, by penalizing those who w ere unfair. This relates back to when Socrates talked about giving everyone his due. Socrates besides came up with the thought that there is no pleasance in being merely other than being merely. The wagess of populating a good life are non for what it brings in this life, but instead for when we are dead. The Old Testament is the same manner because God negotiations about ageless life with him for being merely and ageless life in snake pit for the unfair. Although the two texts are similar in many ways, they besides have really different positions every bit good. The most noticeable difference in idea between the two books is favoritism of good and bad. In Plato # 8217 ; s Republic, Socrates and the other work forces are ever stating how one should, through justness ; benefit 1s # 8217 ; friends who are good people and harm those enemies who are in fact bad. This is know aparting against the people society deems bad or delinquent. It is stating that one should be punished by their enemies and benefited by their friends. In the Old Testament God punishes everyone for what they have done incorrect, there is no favoritism when it comes to justness. In the narrative of Adam and Eve, God loves them but prohibit them to eat from the tree of cognition. The snake persuades Eve to eat the fruit who so in bend pursued Adam to eat the fruit. After they ate the fruit they realized that they were naked and had cognition. In the eyes of God ignorance is merely. Because Adam and Eve Ate from the out tree and had gained cognition, it became unfair. This po sition contradicts greatly with that of Plato. In the terminal of his book the Republic, Socrates comes to the decision that justness is a affair of cognition, and that unfairness is a affair of ignorance. He comes to this decision by calculating that a good educated adult male with a batch of cognition will hold a better apprehension of justness than an nescient adult male who can # 8217 ; t state right from incorrect. Both of these books represent a good but contradictory position of justness, much like our ain society today. The ideals of justness to twenty-four hours in American society are more or less good defined, as they have been made into Torahs. These Torahs were more or less formed around the Ten Commandments, which can be found in the Old Testament. These Torahs are the basic construction of our fundamental law today. In Plato # 8217 ; s Republic Thrasumachus says that justness is what is in the involvement of the stronger party. These Torahs are deemed merely and what is merely is obeisance to these Torahs by the weaker party. This is really much the manner it is in America today. The people in power, viz. Congress, make the Torahs and we all must follow them. To believe that because our Torahs are merely because Congress said so is incorrect. That is like stating that it is unfair to rush on the expressway. It is non unfair, or even merely, it is merely driving fast. The celebrated phrase # 8220 ; An oculus for an oculus, a tooth for a tooth # 8221 ; is outstanding in America today. Many p eople believe that whatever is done should be repaid with justness of the same effect as the original action. The thoughts of justness in America today were influenced by ancient philosophical texts such as these. And in our society today, America is complimented with holding a good justness system. The thoughts of Plato and the Hagiographas from the Bible no uncertainty played a large function in the forming of our fundamental law, in stating what is merely and unfair. Both the Old Testament and Plato # 8217 ; s Republic offer great penetration into the thoughts of justness. These thoughts, like the Ten Commandments, have helped determine the Torahs in consequence in America today. Although the significance of justness is really elusive, the common thought of why a individual is merely is the same in all societies. This thought says that there is no pleasance in being merely other than for the fact of being merely. Peoples are merely because the wagess of populating a good life are non for the wagess it brings in this life, but instead for when we are dead. This is why Marx called faith the # 8220 ; opium of the people. # 8221 ; Because they are willing to move in a reserved mode and be merely, for something that has neer been seen or proven. I dissagree with this and believe that everyone who is merely is so for his or her ain grounds. There can non be a fit definition of justness in our free society because everyone has their ain penetrations and Acts of the Apostless on their ain ideas. Justice is really difficult to explicate because it is really abstract and has many facets to it. The Old Testament and Plato # 8217 ; s Republic offer us great penetrations into the significance of justness, but neither one can give a clear and unflawed definition of what true justness is.